Absolutely,no doubt in that. But should it be that way?
We have same boundary between G and C in our CTA,so as seen in this topic, it leaves place for different interpretation.
In our APP sector, however, MRVA's introduced. We have G at 1500' and 3000', MRVA' set at 2500' and 4000' accordingly to keep at least 1000ft from traffic in G.
Not to open separate topic another example:
CTR ( class C): SFC-2500 ft. MRVA-1500 ft. Around CTR class G up to 1500 ft.
Aircraft (A) inside CTR at 1500 ft flying along boundary of CTR, Aircraft (B) flying at 1500 ft on the other side of boundary in G.
Loss of separation? Or separation is the thickness of boundary line on Controllers display?
