Originally Posted by Mad Jock
2 doors
Or more
Why?
Why? A high wing doesn't have to have a crap view into the turn - my 1947 Stinson has the wing far enough behind the cockpit it's fine, and plenty of high wings have windows in the roof. (I like high wing too, but I'm trying to bottom out the argument for a training aeroplane.)
I do really really want a window in the back of the cabin however.
Trimming a proper trim tab on the elevator.
Why, rather than a spring?
Certified to Spin.
I agree, although I'd probably only certify to 4 turns, erect, or the certification costs get seriously painful.
Limited aero's but nothing special.
I agree. The Auster with +4.5/-2, and clearance for spins, loops, stall turns, and the usual derivative manoeuvres, seems an adequate model.
Sprung steel gear like the PA38 and C152. Large tyres, hydraulic foot brakes.
I agree on all counts (although composite leafsprings can work well too).
Tail dragger option would be nice.
And fairly straightforward.
Cockpit ergonomics similar to the PA38 but different door design.
I agree, very much one of my favourite cockpits as well.
I also like your idea of an EFIS screen switchable between "6-pack" and "Garmin", a straightforward and easy solution to a problem. Shove an analogue ASI and Altimeter in front of the instructor for their use, and as a backup and that should work quite well.
G