If it was a 92 involved....I know exactly where this discussion would be right about now.....and am just wondering why not with the 225?
I think the main reason for so much of the discussion and argument around the S92 was the lack of clarity as to what the aircraft was or wasn't capable of doing with no MGB lubrication, not the lack of a backup lubrication system. There is no doubt as to what to do in this case with 332/225 range.
P1