The article raises some valid points regarding the administrator needing to provide anything resembling 'proof' before shutting down an operation. But after reading the article, through the posts here and making a few phone calls, this case could become a textbook example of 'how not to do it'; for
all involved.
Wish I had a beer in the fridge for every time someone involved has thought "If only I'd done that differently". Who knows, CASA may have gained a modicum of respect and the operation may well still be ticking over.
It's almost a classic comedy of errors, 'cept it ain't funny.