Originally Posted by
PURPLE PITOT
. I still stand by my view point, and fail to understand why others do not, that sometimes you may need to think for yourself.
Could you explain how "thinking for yourself" could have produced a better result
for this exact set of circumstances then following the Boeing SOP for an engine failure after V1 ?
From what I could see there was nothing especially unusual about this case. Yes the engine failed in a nasty place but from my POV simply following the "book" actions would have caused the the aircraft to climb to safe height after which a routine single engine landing would have been prepared for and executed.
What am I missing ?