from the beginning,i was mostly interessted in the human factors of this flight.
i looked at bonin not as being a pilot but as a simple human beeing.it does`nt matter ,if you are a pilot,train-or bus driver,when there is immediate danger for you or your pax,there must be a reaction at once.
in any other case,what will one do? sort things out!
imagine you`re driving in your car,there`s an unusable noise,what wil you do?
you can stop,check your car,accelerate to see if the noise changes or slow down.just to sort things out.
but what you will not do is putting the steering wheel 90% left or right and accelerete until the road cannot manage the speed of the car.
yes there are defiencies in training and manuel flying at AF but there could`nt be a training as bad in any airline worlwide that bonin could forget simple standards :sort things out ,adhere to the QRH and use CRM.
NO WAY !
we must not forget that he was still a pilot with nearly 3000 hours on the book.this was a minor UAS event.it is a characterisk of humang beings ,if you don`t know what`s going on to sort things out.
what was the thougt-model he developed in his head within a few seconds?
and most surprisingley,the pnf even when it looks like he "knew a bit better" was similar clueless what was going on,both forgot at the sane time the simpliest meassures,CRM,QRH.
this failure of two pilots at the same time is unbelieveable.
did they develope the same thought-model? why,what did they see?
some say we did`nt have the whole CVR report.
BEA made so many informations public before the final report as in any acc.inv.before so why not the whole content?
could`nt it be that they heard someting what no investigation team
heard before and is this the reason we must wait so long for the final report?
by the way AB surely condemns the day they have introduced that s/w feature