Please leave the moderating to the moderators. MOL is welcome to ask the questions he has been asking even if he doesn't realise that he too is insulting some of us with his insinuations. What he doesn't seem to realise is that when it comes to the technical explanations of what we, as professional crew base our decisions on is fact and what the passengers seem to base theirs on is their 'perceptions' of what we do when we are at work.
We have already had the company's backing of the crew and an explanation based on their report. We have also had the interviews of some of the passengers which have shown to me at least and probably most of the others who frequent this forum and are in the business, that their stories are conflicting and a lot of their understanding of what a crew does when confronted with disruptive passengers is painfully inadequate.
Now we have an MP wanting an inquiry. Well, I am sure that the MOR, the police report and the subsequent court cases will provide some answers. Do MPs always call for an inquiry when some police are called out to cover an incident involving football hooligans?
At least here on PPRuNe we are able to correct some of the wilder presumptions and inaccurate speculation made by those who are not 'in the job'. By allowing posters such as MOL to make their insinuations we are able to see where the distortions are coming from.