But to postulate, make comparisons, or give pre-conceived predictions of what may have happened without the facts will not help any of us in the industry....
Who has done that?
Why the pro/con reference?
Are you suggesting there are only two views to be found here....one that always blames the aircraft (no matter the accident chain) or others who always blame the Pilots (no matter the accident chain).....or is there a third group who see accidents (of any aircraft type and model) as being a series of events that lead to a crash, with multiple causal factors with some being more critical than others?
Within a few posts there was an article that suggested it was not an "aircraft malfunction" which was patently premature.
I am on record as saying....."Lets see how this plays out.", and suggested we wait to hear what the Data/CVR recorders, surviving crew, and any witnesses have to say.
So far we have one vote against an aircraft malfunction, one input saying high winds, one saying a fire of some sort, and one saying crew error. All are not from any credible source at this time.