Attitudinal. Case in point? In a forensic follow up, everything needs to be spilled onto the conference table. Everything. All the traces, data, and artifacts. Withholding anything is withholding everything. No secrets. Without transparency, the old ones hold too closely the POWER. I foresee the loss (good riddance) of the old mercantile dynamic of "Trade secrets".
As with the tribes of old, and long before common knowledge, the Shaman had spells, icons, totems, and chants. All to cow the tribesmen into a fear that perpetuated the power of the Shamans' BOSS, the Chief, and his allies abroad.
The interface can be pitched as complex, as with anything. It will be soon understood, and well, by the common man. I am optomistic we will soon see the loss through attrition of the old suits, the liars, the con men, the profiteers.
It's a MACHINE, eh?
Command, not Power. The first requires discretion and wisdom, the second, merely secrets held by the unworthy. The old ones fear the loss of proprietary, and to be found out to be shamans.
sayin.