Quote:
Indeed, the
system has to be sure of itself to provide news (particularly good news such as:
you now can rely on...)
AZR, i am "technically oriented". But, this "non technical value"
(
confidence) is of
extreme importance. I don't like the scenario
of a crew with no confidence on the "interface" (even partially). This is
very dangerous and can led to "dramatic" possibilities.
It would be very interesting to understand the current approach in "detail"
(algorithm). Can be in "managerial" level. An outline. Maybe
A33Zab could
also help on this.
If i understand your question correctly,
'Good news' is if ECAM message/action is properly handled, understood and cleared by crew.
VERY good news is if ECAM message or FLAG is cleared by the system itself because that means the anomaly is not present anymore.
For the speed indication it is more difficult:
but they are in view (ADR 3 standy/isis and selectable to show on any PFD)
so if they are consistent again after anomaly the crew will know UAS is not present anymore.