Rod1 has decided not to post on the LAA forum so he does not appear to break the rules.
Steve has given a lot of thebackground to the 'issues' with the LAA forum. It is a huge shame that the attitudes are so inflexible and dogmatic - but the PFA was always 'an old man's organisation' in the sense that committee positions and attitudes were orientated that way.
The change in name was supposed to demonstrate a more open, inclusive and wider approach - but
PR is easy, changing the people will probably be the only way for the walk to match the talk.
But there is a cracking good memembers magazine - if the people involved saw the internet complementing that rather than competing maybe some of the walk would match the talk?