Got about 600 hrs. in the Tecnam GOLF P-96 ( low wing, Cherokee look-alike) now, and agree with most comments, lots of right rudder with high power settings and the throttle tension is not exactly the best design, but all Rotax 912 engines have a spring system that increase power if you let it go of the throttle with slack tension.
Also fly an ALPI that has a central throttle and a 'proper' throttle tension device of the knurled nut type around the base of the throttle spindle, I slacken it off for better control on finals, then as I retard the throttle for landing use the middle finger to apply a little clockwise tension to stop the throttle advancing as I let go to go for the handbrake, but you can't do that with the Tecnams' notchy device. Can only have been designed by .. OOps, can't say that !
Big difference is lack of weight i.e. inertia, the minute you reduce throttle over the threshold you sink, can't pull the power off and use the inertia to grease it on, has to be flown on with a trickle of power
The lack of footbrakes -v - a handbrake takes a bit of getting used to -tho' I think later models of Tecnams have changed - and I still find myself going for the feet, sometimes need three hands to manage stick, throttle and brake lever, too.
Apart from that the Tecnam knocks spots off a C-152 - no comparison, and its' FUN !!