It was mentioned that "Approach to STALL" recovery at Colgan prior to, no altitude loss was the goal. You mentioned a recovery with ND; at Colgan, losing more than 100 feet was disqualifying. I tend to agree with your presentation, from 350, any recovery from Stall will use up more than half the total altitude, and may not even be possible, especially if no AoA indicator to 'help' guard against secondary STALL?
I cannot understand why the focus is on something that is at best tangential, and when grumpy, totally irrelevant. To have lost control in the first place makes the STALL recovery argument silly. Whatever the cause, to deplete her energy in that fashion suggests that it will not be suddenly available to be careful with that which may be regained in a 20k dive?