Hi,
HazelNuts39
That's about the lawyers request (Les principaux extraits...), nothing about the judge's response, nor about BEA's responsibility in this. Doesn't the judge makes his or her own decisions, independent of BEA's investigation?
We should try to make an effort to understand what the lawyer says in this interview
It simply says that BEA has passed the entire FDR to Airbus company
He also said that Airbus is one of the parties named in the lawsuit .. as are other civil parties that is to say the associations of families of victims and people with right
Also it is not normal in terms of law that either party has the intelligence and the other does not ...
And it's even more weird that the judge handling the case should not take a decision to correct the imbalance .. as she refused to join the FDR in the instruction process (so far)
The families associations have the right (as civil party) to have their own experts ... but how they can make expertise with no datas ???
Hope it's help to understand what happen there ...