MP, I assume that you mean teaching the ‘contents’ of the model – the principles and processes. I have seen examples where only ‘the model’ is used, listing the principles, and calling that airmanship!
Teaching airmanship during initial training is essential, using Kern’s model as a guide is very useful. The elements provide a good basis for professional ideals, advancement, and a reminder of the critical aspects of behaviour.
Many military pilots have been taught the elements of airmanship according to this model (e.g. RAF a long time ago); however I do not recall any description of a model being given or any specific discussion of the elements. ‘Airmanship’ issues were linked with safety, lookout, fuel and weather, learning originated from example, exposure and debriefing. This format was continued in advanced training, where the flight and operational instruction developed and tested the elements and processes. With time, students were taught airmanship, but most importantly how to use it and improve it – how to think, how to learn.
Modern aviation presents many challenges, particularly for training which depends on gaining expertise. Some elements of airmanship have been affected by social or cultural change, others by the change in the perceived need for knowledge or proficiency with the use of automation, and the reduced opportunity for gaining experience.
Thus modern airmanship many not relate to the details in Kern’s model, particularly the military examples; however the principles, and those of human behaviour within the model are still very valid and must not be discarded in training.
Some of Kerns work can be downloaded from
EFP - Estudio de Formación de Pilotos however I suggest that this is used as ‘further reading’.
Also,
The marks of an airman.
For an alternative, but parallel view;
Airmanship training for modern aircrew. (2004 military)