Those of us who contested your accident numbers were bothered by your fatality number (3,000), not the number of groundloop accidents. From the beginning,we were trying to point out to you that groundloops are pretty much by definition relatively low-speed accidents and therefore eminently survivable. Sort of like those incidents beloved of the nightly news, the gear-up landing...
To return to the original point of this thread, the poster was looking for widowmakers, not wife-embarrassers.