Chugalug re your 8 Jan post:
<<... , no definitive evidence from the wreckage.>>
For someone who has spent so much time on the Mull thread you are appallingly ignorant – perhaps people reading this thread who are interested in airworthiness should take the trouble of checking out the old Mull thread which should remove the Chinook tragedy from consideration as a consequence of airworthiness. As I pointed out in that thread, their course, control actions, and engine states had a rational explanation which predicted the use of certain kit which was eventually established to have been fitted – QED. Is it “idiosyncratic” to face up to the evidence, however unpalatable?