The information continues to flow from the 14th February 2012 Senate RAT hearings (Page 72 for the Hansard report), Paul Phelan has published this yesterday:
Filling in the information gaps
The upshot of this is that why should
"we" as the community be backing an un-insured party in an action, that on the face of it was started by a dis-gruntled FOI with ideas of his own.
WELL!!! done casa!!!!
and
Should we be supporting this un-named casa person???
What of the internal casa legal advice???