PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ADF v. GPS
Thread: ADF v. GPS
View Single Post
Old 13th February 2012 | 19:10
  #42 (permalink)  
mad_jock
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Yes the AP does reduce workload Peter.

Approach bans were brought in for a reason. They do work.

Have you actually read what they did?

http://www.aaiu.ie/upload/general/13...2011_005-0.PDF

There is nothing to think about if your given an rvr of 300/350/500 and your CAT I only. If you have an AP or not.

Then to be given 350/350/400 and to continue to go around at 100ft agl. off a CAT II runway which lighting is all I can say is impressive.

Then have another shot when it was 350/350/350 and bust it this time by 110ft

Then have a go again when its 500/400/400 again to bust mins by 100ft. then to unfortunately crash off the Go-around. Which I might add even if you do have a AP would be disconnected as soon as you pressed the TOGA button

For those that don't know CAT I is 550m RVR and CAT II is 300m.

I really really can't see how an AP would have changed matters Peter they should have never left the hold.

All IR pilots both professional and private should have a bloody good read of that report.

O and I don't think using either the GPS or ADF would have effected the out come in this case.

Last edited by mad_jock; 13th February 2012 at 19:24.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply