You show your "ignorance" at
What comes back from legal drafting can be completely different to CASA's intent. CASA have to work within the framework for legislation set by other departments, who unfortunately have no idea about aviation.
If you dig deep enough, you may find that "Strict Liability" is not of CASA's making.
My take is its just standard CASA corporate disinterest, sloth, denial,neglience and neglect in doing something about rectifying 206
When the new CARs came out, it was made illegal to fly at night without a rating. It took six years, or there abouts, for the CAO 29.2 to see the light of day again. CASA FOI's were constantly reminded about the problem, but the feedback we got was that it was a legal drafting problem. CASA wanted it but what CASA want is not necessarily what CASA get.
Having raised the matter of 206 and the interpretation many times with various levels within CASA, their hands are tied. It just will not happen. We all, including CASA, have to wait for the remaining CASRs.