Once you have some facts in hand, that might be the time to slag off the authorities or the CEO or whomever contributed to the accident but until then, the one or ones in the crosshairs is/are the late pilot/crew of an accident flight, when that is just another risk we have to accept.
Chuks, it seems that without any of the facts, you hare happy to slag off the pilot. Surely all facts must be considered before ANY blame can be attributed. Am I to assume, based on your statement, that until the facts are proven, it is okay to destroy a mans reputation but not acceptable to mention any of the other parties that are clearly involved?