hoteltango
1) If there was no evidence of him consuming alcohol then why was he breathalaysed in the first place?
2) He may have passed the second test, but he FAILED the first test. Also we dont know the time from the first test to the second test. Bearing in mind that the body disposes of alcohol at the rate of 1 unit per hour, he could still have had a reading of .08 at the time of the second test. The second test is not more stringent than the first, the levels are the same.
Also the company have requested the cctv recordings of the day in question so that should shed more light.
3)If you dont like what I have to say, then jog on old boy, and leave the debate to people with an IQ of 70+.
The members of staff are all suspended until further notice.