PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Glideslope dot deflexion = which angle ?
Thread
:
Glideslope dot deflexion = which angle ?
View Single Post
19th January 2012 | 18:23
#
2
(
permalink
)
Checkboard
Joined:
Aug 1998
:
ATPL
Posts:
6,623
Likes:
847
From:
Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
http://www.pprune.org/engineers-tech...lope-dots.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clyde Parthangel
Without getting too technical, it depends on the glidepath angle. For the Glidepath, full scale deflection of the CDI - five dots or 2.5 dots depending on the type of instrument - is defined by the Displacement Sensitivity of the Glidepath. This is known by ILS tecchies as the 'Width'. It is dictated by ICAO Annex 10 as ±0.48 Theta, where Theta is the Glidepath angle (between 2° and 4°). For a 3° Glidepath angle, this works out for full scale deflection as 4.44° (full scale fly down) and 1.56° (full scale fly-up). However, linearity across this span is not guaranteed. It is reasonably linear to half scale but outside that all bets are off! For this reason, the engineers and flight inspectors measure at ±0.24 Theta. However, please bear in mind that despite what the CPL textbook diagrams show, a glidepath is not sharply defined. It is produced by the mixing of signals reflected off an imperfect surface (the ground in front of the glidepath) so if you imagine the quality of the reflection that you see in a creased and crumpled piece of aluminium foil that has been flattened out, you might get some idea of what the glideslope signal 'looks like' in reality.
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/45538...ction-cdi.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ft
The LOC course sector width does depend on runway length, and you are correct that the nominal width is to have full deflection 105 m (350 ft) either side of the threshold*.
The width is, however, limited to six degrees. On shorter runways, this creates a problem which is solved by instead having full deflection equal to the same displacement at point B, which is 1050 m (3500 ft) from the threshold.
This is specified in ICAO Annex 10 Vol I §3.1.3.7.
The 2.5 degree figure often given is just another "close enough and won't confuse the public" figure.
Cheers,
Fred
*) Or the ILS reference datum, if we are to be strict about the definitions. That's where you'll be when crossing the threshold.
Reply
0
0
Checkboard
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Checkboard