SI/CHK 57
JFZ90. (Re your previous post not the one directly above this)
You may well be right but why then is an SI that was clearly relevant not mentioned or not known about by the BoI?
Why was Lord Phillip told something that was patently not true?
Why most particularly of course given the fault's existence and the possibility that it might, and we can of course only say might, have been an issue did anyone think that it was something that shouldnt be mentioned.
Why were so many people so certain the pilots should be blamed?
The answer for most of these people, you might hope all of them, was that they did not know of the existence of the SI and the inflight check procedure instituted after the crash.
You only need one lie to enter the system and be recycled a few times for it to become the received 'truth'.
Last edited by Mick Smith; 9th Jan 2012 at 08:38.