Being slow-witted, I can't quite see the point of the EC175 when compared against the EC225. I mean, 100 NM radius with 18 pax, presumably returning to base with 45 mins fuel remaining. Really....and?
With the same 45 mins fuel remaining, the EC225 routinely carries 19 pax, and has radius of action of 190 NM. (Arrogant yawn).
Wherever the EC175 might be intended to operate, it doesn't seem to fit a niche operating to Northern North Sea decks from Aberdeen. Even the S92 can't hold a candle to the EC225 when comparing load carried versus range versus fuel consumption.
Climb the EC225 to FL80, it does that smoothly and easily, reduce the lever to a division below MCP on the FLI to maintain the average 145 kt TAS, the fuel consumption drops to below 590 kg/hr, increasing the radius of action to 210 NM. An easy 10% gain!
And so for specific fuel consumption per passenger and effective range, the EC225 is the clear leader. I rest my case M'Lud. (Smug smile).
Last edited by Colibri49; 7th Jan 2012 at 11:01.