PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Campaign for a proper instrument rating
View Single Post
Old 20th Nov 2002, 15:20
  #15 (permalink)  
bluskis
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading the previous posts with interest, it appears the most desirable outcome to any campaign would be the reintroduction of the non aproved route to an IR, as suggested by Aerobatic Flyer.

However the biggest obstacle to the UK achieving this is that it would have to be part of the non JAA licence as far as I can see, so there would remain the difficulty of getting legal recognition of the rating in other countries.

The worse outcome would be to lose the IMC rating in any review of the licencing regulations.

Ghengis's shot at describing alternatives is interesting, but fraught with detail problems. For instance his IR1 speed would be too slow for a lot of light twins, his height is lower than France allows VFR airways, etc,etc.

Yes non approved, training as necessary to reach the standard, theory by distance learning, accessable annual examiners all good ideas, but perhaps the phrase non approved needs a rethink.
bluskis is offline