PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Campaign for a proper instrument rating
View Single Post
Old 20th November 2002 | 13:36
  #10 (permalink)  
slim_slag
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
From: He's on the limb to nowhere
Gengis

What a complicated and beaurocratic mess There is a perfectly decent, safe and proven model for all this, where to fly in clouds you need an ICAO IR, and that's about it. Unfortunately it's 'over there' so in the eyes of many must be inferior.

I guess you are saying an IR3 (airline pilot) is better than an IR1 (warrior pilot). Do you think that a 737 pilot who never flies a PA-28 is going to be better/safer at flying a PA-28 to 200ft DH than an IR1 who does that every other day? It's not so! Type ratings are the way to introduce this IR1, IR2, IR3 complexity. Insurance companies are also effective at mandating training for the IR2 type of plane, as would be actual testing of IR skills on a multi engine plane before you could fly it.
slim_slag is offline