Instead of actually having hard evidence of a breach, people launch into accusations and insinuations of (wilful) illegality.
I thought that's how strict liability worked, the burden of proof is on the accused. Perhaps somebody should put up the evidence that no offence occurred and everybody would go away. That way the media wouldn't involve itself in embellishing events like those of Fred Nurk, (Broadmeadow), who was recently interviewed stating.... I wouldn't want one of those "unsafe" A380's flying so low over my house with bits dropping off, they should all be grounded like they did with Ansett.