PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - When a company SOP deliberately contradicts FCTM advice without valid reason.
Old 24th December 2011 | 08:33
  #5 (permalink)  
rudolf
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am.
The FCTM says not recommended rather than forbidden, as long as there is guidance on how the ARM function works then I don't see a problem. I fly for an airline that regularly uses this to provide low speed protection, however, we recommend not using it in gusty conditions because of the increased risk of it activating.

Can't speak for Australia but in Europe an NTO is no longer needed, as long as a risk assessment has been carried out then this will suffice.
rudolf is offline  
Reply