PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why does the PA-38 Tomahawk have a wing life of 11,000 hours?
Old 17th Dec 2011, 09:10
  #33 (permalink)  
Dan the weegie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AT3 is lighter, more aerodynamic but nowhere near as tough, it also has more frequent and expensive tech issues. Not to mention being £100k to buy.

It's a good plane but it's been designed for a different job, not to mention that it needs full rudder on the take off roll in zero wind, which is wholly unacceptable for a trainer.

the CT and the C42 are the same except that they're microlights, so only good for NPPL (M) and PPL (M).

Those flying schools I spoke to that have been using the AT3 in anger, wish they weren't for the above reasons.

Mission is key. You can't compare apples and cucumbers or oranges with potatoes
Dan the weegie is offline