DozyWannabe,
My apology. In hindsight that what I wrote above was (unintentionally) insenstive and presumptuous. I was referring more to me, because I was, in in fact, "taken in" by Vette in the past. But maybe not you. My position is one of caution. I've been through these arguments before and been found wrong (I think), so as a layman, I'm not about proclaim that this time round, I have the definitive truth.
Which leads me to
It is that word - "reasonable" - that defines the difference of opinion.
So the case against Vette/Mahon is a reasonable one? I wrote what I wrote because I was getting the impression from you that this isn't so- that only the Vette position is reasonable.
Cheers