PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - What Alec Baldwin doesn’t know about air travel
Old 15th Dec 2011, 00:19
  #21 (permalink)  
Nervous SLF
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am confused now ( nothing new there then ) but in another thread on PPRuNe
a poster says interference won't happen.
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/47168...ipads-faa.html

stepwilk

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 703


The one thing that everybody seems to be missing about these electronics-shutdown rules is that they actually have nothing to do with imagined "radio interference." The reason for these rules is that the airlines and the FAA want passengers paying attention, undistracted, able to hear cabin-crew instructions during the crucial phases of flight. They don't want them playing word games, or having earphones clamped on their heads, or making cellphone calls when they should be at least minimally paying attention.

You can argue all you want about whether the stuff needs to stay off till 10,000 feet, or whether sitting at a gate with the door closed counts as "flight," but the whole frequency-interference thing is a red herring.

The airlines would be better off making this point rather than to continue hinting that the electronics "could interfere with avionics," which nobody believes anyway. A few people might at least minimally accept the explanation that they should not be distracted.


So who do I believe as both arguements seem valid.?
Nervous SLF is offline