North Sea weather this winter

[topendtorque]

Now TET, even a thickie like me can work out that nearly all of the available met data would be from the last century, and we are only in year 12 of this one. So, even assuming you are right, what you have said would hardly be surprising.

And why not help fix all that inaccuracy on Wikipedia by contributing? Won't cost you a penny

My beef about the mob of thickets was they had a senior editor come on line and delete a whole heap of the sceptic’s arguments after - and what used to be a general practice but now amended I believe- a reader came on free to air amending so called scientific papers. So sure, delete one side of the argument and it will be hard to be any other than thick about it.

In the links below you can see arguments backing up Sasless's comments, in 1. From Donna Laframboise, a tremendous Canadian scribe and;
2. A funny story from Tim Blair talking about our effing pollies and who is one of our great anti warm bloggers and a very funny scribe, as good as the British James Dellinpole I reckon. You might like to follow both on their anti AGW trails.
The third one is about the latest book from another famous and real scientist Ian Plimer and a pollie of whom you may have heard.

My point about the historical weather events is simple, they all happened inside our recorded history well before this big bad phoo-bear AGW, came on the scene.

Our chief warmest is Tim Flannery who despite his predictions of gloom - all our capital cities running out of water by 2012 etc, some of ‘em near got washed away last year - has bought himself a house on the seafront well below his predicted sea water rise.

Durban was a great success, the warmists are gloating and I agree. They have formed a bond so they say to force everyone to formalise an agreement about handling AGW in 2015 or 2020 or something. Their problem will be that like Flim Flam (above) all of the dire predictions will have been found as worthless by then and the whole process seen as a fraud.

But there is just one teensy weensy detail that you may have overlooked and Gore, Flim Flam and all the rest can shout doom and gloom all they like, but when it comes to changing datums, real datums that the world works with it aint quite as simple as idle rhetoric in the press by the noisy minority such as Gore.
The teensy detail to which I refer is the one which we use every time we fly, ISA. It would be a real root if it changed by several degrees just because Gore said it would and we all crashed because silly us are working on the old standard.
Answer this if you can, why hasn’t ICAO amended their temperature datums in line with AGW predictions?

http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2011/12/13/over-the-top-climate-rhetoric/
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/at_least_he_didnt_cry/
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/warmies_schooled/