Now TET, even a thickie like me can work out that nearly all of the available met data would be from the last century, and we are only in year 12 of this one. So, even assuming you are right, what you have said would hardly be surprising.
And why not help fix all that inaccuracy on Wikipedia by contributing? Won't cost you a penny
One of the principle sources in the Thickerpedia synopsis is the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, itself a reflection of the available data and expert opinion. The conclusion is that not only is climate change real but that, with virtual certainty, it is caused by human activity.
Quite honestly, I have no interest in "believing" or "denying": but I do find the level of skepticism about majority scientific opinion very odd. What do people think they know better than the majority of climate scientists? Or have they been distracted by equal media coverage given to minority opinion and bad science?