PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - C17 v A400M
Thread: C17 v A400M
View Single Post
Old 11th Nov 2002, 21:54
  #52 (permalink)  
BEagle
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,848
Received 328 Likes on 115 Posts
No - sorry, BB, but I happen to think that, given half a chance, the A400M will be an excellent aeroplane.....

I'm certain that its payload/ range performance will be far better than that of the old C130K - or the C130J. Though not as good as the vastly more expensive C17 - nor, of course, as good as the An225 if we must compare apples and oranges!

It could also make a perfectly good AAR aeroplane - if EADS weren't trying to develop the A330-200 tanker at the same time.

Having done a bit of number-crunching on the Oz tanker-transport requirement described in 'Flight', the required fuel volume would appear to be in the order of 85-90 tonnes minimum. Which rules out A400M and A310MRTT, is probably tight for KC767 but is within the published capability of A330-200. Or of old TriShaws.......

Last edited by BEagle; 12th Nov 2002 at 06:05.
BEagle is online now