Actual Vs Planned Landing Distance
It appears that our new training provider is advising crews that the "correct" landing distance for part 91 operations is the actual landing distance, and that planned landing distances using the 60/40 rule only apply to part 135.
In theory this is correct, certainly part 91 doesn't stipulate any requirements.
I would presume that the JAA regulations are similar.
So what is your personal limit for landing runway length requirements under normal operations? Are you happy to use Actual Runway Length or do you apply any additional requirements?
Mutt