There is some news - The Insurance company / loss adjustors have not let this matter die, as Mr Weaver and (Im told) his associate PK, seemed to hope. They are working hard with the authorities to establish the truth and the latest is that an eye witness has confirmed that the pilot was named "Mark" but from photographs of the person Weaver named as the pilot could not positively identify the photographs as the same "Mark" as Weaver claimed was in the aircraft. Which seems to tie up with the person (who Weaver claimed was the pilot) saying he did not know Weaver.
All I know for certain is that Weaver should have been flying the aircraft to satisfy the insurance, he has admitted being in the aircraft, he has also admitted that he knew he was not qualified for the flight.
Even I doubt that Robert is silly enough to consider identity theft.
Oh dear, its looking more iffy by the day. I do wonder if this one is going to need a Judge and Jury to sort out?
Last edited by goldeneaglepilot; 3rd Dec 2011 at 07:12.