Multiple posters have disagreed with you along the way, and your latest "concept" bears no resemblance to your original
My explanation from page 1 until page 5 has remained unchanged, and until the laws of physics change - will remain so.
the answers at #43 and #47 are still there.
Posts 43 and 47 do not answer my question. In fact, they (like your most recent post) deliberately avoid it. AGAIN.
Since you are still unable to explain why a high pressure ratio turbine is more thermodynamically efficient, I'm going to assume you are admitting you really don't know.
