PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - V2 vs. weight vs. climb question
View Single Post
Old 25th November 2011 | 13:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Trolltuner
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Norway
Angel V2 vs. weight vs. climb question

I probably should have posted this here first but, risking a breach of forum etiquette, I'll re-post the thread here:

http://www.pprune.org/biz-jets-ag-fl...-more-huh.html

Summarizing the scenario: I have a Gulfstream III (G-1159A) at its MTOM of 69,700 lbs. (Please, no correction or discussion of weight in lbs. vs. mass in kg. needed ). It has been noise certificated as a Stage 2/Chapter2 airplane per this procedure from the AFM:

GIII Noise - Trolltune Corporation

164 KIAS (which = 164 KCAS/KEAS at sea level ISA) is V2+10 at MTOM.

Now, I decide to reduce MTOM to 61,500 lbs and climb at V2+20. Note that V2+10 at HW equals V2+20 at LW (164 KIAS), where LW = low weight, HW = high weight. What is the effect on climb? According to responses in the other biz-av thread, I can expect an increase in deck angle, climb angle, and climb rate. Although that sounds counter-intuitive, are we perhaps getting closer to (the airspeed we seldom discuss for such an airplane) Vy?

I have the G-III AFM but would like to quantify the changes after understanding the core answers to the question.

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Tom
Trolltuner is offline  
Reply