It seems to me that it's a weird world when we have posters on a thread such as this attacking the CEO of a company that has the support of 98% of its shareholders and made $500 million profit last financial year and yet yesterday a competitor's CEO had his remuneration package voted against by 45% of its shareholders and made a loss for the year and yet another airline in Australia declined to forecast a profit for next year and the only other Australian trunk airline is still losing money after being grounded for being badly run.
I'm not sure who has it right and who has it wrong. I suspect it is probably not the posters on this thread.