Originally Posted by
infrequentflyer789
We mostly agree. I think the autotrim discussion probably merits a thread in itself as it goes much wide than this accident.
Why not
Originally Posted by
infrequentflyer789
In more general terms I fear the industry may have got itself into a nasty spiral:
- more accidents per hour in manual flying therefore we should use more automatics
- only times pilots get handed the plane is when George says "something's wrong because we've got to the edge of the envelope, I have limited (no) intelligence and don't know what to do now, so you have control. By the way, that's the stick shaker..."
- resulting crash happens with human in control and is then another tick in the "mechanics are better than meat" box
- return to (1)
Nicely put!
Originally Posted by
infrequentflyer789
I've thought for a while that it might even be beneficial if George took a mandatory random bathroom break every flight or so, just to ensure the real pilots are kept excrcised. Ecam: "you have control, I'm off down the back for a pee and to chat up the cute FA, back in 15".
Now that would be a reason to call automation "HAL". The under-tought is interesting
but please don't try to sell it that way