Lyman
It is a matter of some consequence...."Flight Law changed at approximately 2:10:05...." per BEA.
This is a word that invites doubt, and conjecture. It is an inappropriate statement, and not consistent with accepted levels of research. Alone, the phrase is amateurish, and there is no further refinement.
What prompted the statement? How was it derived? What is the Data referenced to prompt this speculation?
Though I am not inclined to blindly trust the reports that come from a French organization (because of France's huge investment in AI), I'm waiting for the final report before I'd judge that items are missing.
And, I don't understand your term, "inappropriate statement." Isn't that event documented be ACARS?