PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Aviation Mythology and Misconceptions
View Single Post
Old 15th November 2011 | 21:06
  #93 (permalink)  
911slf
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 13
From: Sheffield
#79 Yes Tourist - but Newton suffices

Don't disagree with the general drift () of your post but Newton suffices. While Einstein extends our knowledge we don't need him for flying aircraft.

NEWTON Inertial frame of reference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contains this
The motion of a body can only be described relative to something else - other bodies, observers, or a set of space-time coordinates. These are called frames of reference. If the coordinates are chosen badly, the laws of motion may be more complex than necessary.
In air that is moving at constant velocity you have a good frame of reference for flying speed. It is a rubbish frame of reference for ground speed.

My hang gliding instructor used to say 'the ground is a dangerous place, stay away from it'.

Last edited by 911slf; 15th November 2011 at 21:08. Reason: insert reference to #79
911slf is offline  
Reply