airtren
I was referring in general to an airplane involved in an accident - you've "quoted" the last part of it - but I agree the wording could be clearer in that respect, so I edited, to make it clearer.
If you have a problem with it in its edited form, please let me know.
and your edit
Any system failure or system weakness exposed by an accident, which otherwise would not be known, MUST continue to be the focus of fixing, or being eliminated, as to bring that airplane back in line with its expected safety standard behavior before this exposure
agree
regardless of who's at fault,
he who breaks the crockery must pick up the pieces
That's the basis of continued airworthiness
in other words no manufacturer or operator is going to allow his product to continue to injure people, just because they feel it's the other guys fault.
The issue for some time has been, what has been done, what will be done and when,
I'm just not impressed with pages and pages of discussion about the future actions needed from folks that have no dog in this arena.