aside from the pitot tube issues (which are serious, and Airbus/AF have some 'splaining to do there...)
Dozy,
Given -
- the history of the pitot issues in Interim #1,
- the recommendations in the area of certification in Interim #2,
- the existence of UAS procedures in AF and AB manuals,
- that DFDR and CVR have hardly added anything to this issue,
do you expect anymore 'splaining in the final report, or are you perhaps referring to the judicial proceedings?