All this at the hands of a totally unaccountable bureaucrat with delusions of grandeur, who appears to have manipulated the law to prove a point. No doubt the good director will be promoting him in the near future.
Such acts don't happen at the hands of a single Burorat! The system right up to the top permits it, probably even encourages it!! No doubt the failure to disclose such a CDPP decision in the tribunal documents (I am presuming) was the reason the impact was not considered vital in the ultimate decision. Surely such a decision (CDPP) not to prosecute is not made lightly.
CASA LSD would naturally exclude anything that would be negative to their case as they are trained to do in an "adversarial" legal system. If lies won't win, just don't bring up the subject, who's to know. And should the victim go so far as to refer to Freedom of Information, well then there is the Client Legal Privilege, a Win Win situation? the true example of the Model Litigant.