Misleading title
Seems that the original post link is somewhat misleading.
The headline in the link states "damage to Lufthansa A380..."
Reading the article it becomes clear that it was the gate bridge that struck the aircraft not the aircraft that struck the bridge.
It may be that the 380 is hard to maneuver around in the airports, but this time it seems that it should be able to state non-guilty.
Nevertheless, of course a damage is a damage regardless of reason.