Originally Posted by Kelpie
The fund can not just be a vehicle to extract premiums from companys through the award provisions to line the pockets of a few chosen individuals
You know Kelpie, I had a lot of respect for you over the senate stuff, but with comments like the one above, I am now beginning to wonder why. That is in the same class as Paul's toxic mix.
As for public spats on the internet, obviously the MBF board are not into that sort of thing, and fair enough too. Perhaps if the truth was revealed to the masses the critics may have a slightly different view on the whole MBF situation. I have said before that I have the utmost respect for the MBF board members I know and some of the conspiracy theories espoused here about them and their actions are so far wide of the mark it's a joke. The incumbents have worked bloody hard to tidy the whole show up to the point of it being a first-class operation.
Originally Posted by Makin
Fortunately two members of the old guard are time expired
Old...and wise.
12 months to make a big change a rule? Are you actually aware of the process that is required to get it right?