There is no reason I can see to claim the PF was not attempting 3-5 degrees UP. Is there a claim he left the thrust alone by mistake? Was it at ~82?
If there was turbulence, perhaps some leeway for the PF not identifying the intital 1.65 g? How is he to sum the g to frame his attitude, and what did he see? Is he Mr. Inertial?
Seen it before; Instant Conclusion, then the search for evidence to sustain. Sometimes it is useful, but only when one understands it is for purposes other than conclusive report. EG: Discussion. Much remains of the evidence that is hidden.
The JUDGE is not allowed to see it? RED FLAG......