This thread seems to have decayed into,who`s in and who`s out.Somebody mentioned on here that its not possible to carry over your`e exam credits over to the JAR system? well its already happening!.My point!!.Lets take somebody doing perf A in june of this year.He or she fails.That person is then allowed to go and sit the eqivalent exam but under JAR.A similar exam but different.Therefore why can a person who has failed some of the exams under the old system not be credited with those exams,and just re sit the ones they failed under JAR.Its not rocket science is it!!.
Look nobodys asking the CAA to just give us the exams,we all understand that.Were just asking for a bit of savy to be used here.After all somebody did state that perhaps we should be helping the CAA form some sort of solution.
If i may go back to the thread that mentions that the exam date cut of points and extensions of partial pass rule changes etc were well documented!!!.Well they wern`t really were they?.I mean lets face it considering that were talking pro job,pro exams blah blah blah,sticking the changes on a website,or relying on people to get information via rumour control,isn`t really cutting the mustard,what ever way you look at it.May i suggest that the CAA should have informed everybody that was in the system via post, who were elligible for remaining under the national exams,of yet again there being changes.It can`t be that hard,after all we are all on there data base!!.Just an idea for the future.
Ref the 10 year thingy.The ground engineers who are licensed have been granted exactly this ruling.There examinations switched over to JAR,with all the cock ups that we have had,but were allowed to keep all there previous exams,and to attain there equivalent under JAR,sitting various new and updated modules within a 10 year period.This is known as Grandfather rights.Each and every individual who qualifed under this directive was informed by post to there home addrese,so there was no grey area.
Ive just chucked in a few ideas,nothing mind boggling just perhaps a little common sense